Why Pete Rose should never be in the Hall of Fame: An opinion

We use affiliate links in this article. And, as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support.

Pete Rose, known as “Charlie Hustle,” was a formidable force in Major League Baseball (MLB). Born on April 14, 1941, in Cincinnati, Ohio, Rose’s career spanned 24 seasons, during which he became MLB’s all-time leader in hits, games played, and at-bats. His relentless playing style and versatility allowed him to excel at multiple positions, earning him 17 All-Star selections, three World Series championships, and the National League Most Valuable Player award in 1973. Transitioning to a managerial role, Rose served as the player-manager for the Cincinnati Reds from 1984 to 1986 and continued as manager until 1989.


Despite his on-field achievements, Rose’s legacy is overshadowed by a significant scandal that led to his lifetime ban from baseball. In 1989, allegations surfaced that Rose had engaged in betting on baseball games, including those involving his own team, the Cincinnati Reds. An investigation led by lawyer John M. Dowd culminated in the “Dowd Report,” which provided detailed evidence of Rose’s gambling activities. Facing mounting evidence, Rose agreed to a settlement with MLB on August 23, 1989, resulting in his permanent ineligibility from the sport. This agreement, known as the “Agreement and Resolution,” was signed by Rose and then-Commissioner A. Bartlett Giamatti. The document stipulated that Rose would be placed on the Ineligible List in accordance with Major League Rule 21, which prohibits betting on baseball games. The agreement allowed Rose to apply for reinstatement after one year; however, no formal findings regarding the gambling allegations were made at that time.
baseball-almanac.com

Being placed on MLB’s Ineligible List carries severe consequences. Individuals on this list are barred from any association with MLB teams, including playing, managing, or holding any other employment within the league. They are also prohibited from participating in MLB-sanctioned events and are ineligible for induction into the Baseball Hall of Fame. The Hall of Fame’s rules specify that any person on the Ineligible List cannot be considered for induction, effectively barring Rose from this honor.
en.wikipedia.org

The investigation into Rose’s gambling activities revealed that he had placed numerous bets on baseball games during his tenure as both a player and manager. The Dowd Report documented that Rose bet on at least one MLB team on 30 different days between March and July 1986, including 21 bets on the Reds. These actions directly violated Major League Rule 21, which strictly prohibits any form of betting on baseball games by players, managers, or other employees.
sportingnews.com

The “Agreement and Resolution” that Rose signed on August 23, 1989, was a pivotal moment in this saga. The agreement was signed in New York City and witnessed by Reuven K. Katz, Rose’s attorney, and Fay Vincent, who would later become the Commissioner of Baseball. By signing this document, Rose accepted his placement on the Ineligible List but did not admit to the allegations of gambling on baseball. In return, MLB agreed to halt its investigation without making a formal finding regarding the gambling allegations. Rose had the option to apply for reinstatement after one year, but the agreement did not guarantee that such a petition would be granted.
baseball-almanac.com

Individuals are banned from baseball primarily to protect the integrity of the sport. Gambling, in particular, poses a significant threat, as it can lead to compromised game outcomes and a loss of public trust. Major League Rule 21(d) explicitly states that any player, umpire, or club or league official or employee who bets on any baseball game in which they have a duty to perform shall be declared permanently ineligible. This rule underscores MLB’s commitment to maintaining the sport’s integrity by imposing strict penalties on those who violate its provisions.
en.wikipedia.org

Reinstating Rose, even posthumously, could pose risks to MLB’s integrity. Allowing a known violator of the league’s gambling policies to be honored could set a precedent that undermines the seriousness of such offenses. It might also send a conflicting message about MLB’s stance on gambling, especially in an era where sports betting is becoming more prevalent. Maintaining Rose’s ban serves as a deterrent to others and reinforces the league’s commitment to upholding its rules and the sport’s integrity.
After his banishment, Rose continued to engage in gambling activities. He relocated to Las Vegas, where he was frequently seen placing bets in casinos and even participated in various gambling-related events. This behavior indicated a persistent disregard for the principles that led to his initial ban and raised concerns about his commitment to rehabilitation. His lifestyle choices post-ban further justified MLB’s decision to uphold his ineligibility.
wsj.com

Pete Rose passed away on September 30, 2024, at the age of 83. Despite his death, the reasons for his banishment remain pertinent. Posthumous reinstatement could be perceived as diminishing the gravity of his violations and might encourage leniency towards similar infractions in the future. To preserve the integrity of the sport and uphold the standards set forth by MLB, it is imperative that Rose’s ban remains in effect, ensuring that the consequences of compromising the game’s integrity are unequivocally understood.

Photo of author

Author

The Baseball Guide